Demographics of Undernourished. Image Credit: Oxfam.org |
Concept Drawing of Vertical Farm. Image Credit: HowStuffWorks.com |
1. Food Efficiency -- With a vertical farm, you don't grow the whole plant. Instead of the traditional tomato plant, you grow just the tomato. Not only does this save a tremendous amount of space, but also the resources used to grow the fruit.
2. Water Efficiency -- Instead of relying on rain, all foods are fed via aeroponics. This mist generating water feeding reduces water usage by a jaw-dropping 98% compared to normal farming methods.
3. Controlled Environment -- With everything being indoors, there is no need for pesticides to ward off insects. Furthermore, we can enhance the fruits with additional nutritional factors. In fact, the vertical farm built in Singapore is about 5 to 10 times more efficient than regular farms.
4. Right Next Door -- Because the products are grown in a skyscraper that can be placed in the middle of a city, there are virtually no transportation costs, eliminating 3.4% of costs.
5. The Auto Farm -- The indoors create an ideal environment for robot hands. This back-breaking work can be replaced by more efficient, and significantly cheaper automation tools. As a result, costs are driven down.
Vertical farming has the potential to solve the starving billion because it makes food very efficiently. With efficiency comes substantial price drops. Imagine lowering food costs by a factor of 10 or even 100. What if your weekly grocery bill was $10? How about $1? In the coming years, vertical farming has more than just the potential to grow. It will flourish.
© Nicholas Shah and Learning More Than Living, 2013. Please note that the material included this was not written by a licensed medical professional. Therefore, please consult your physician before trying anything suggested in this article. Please note that there was an image used from Oxfam.org. This blog does not claim ownership of that image. Furthermore, there was a second image from Howstuffworks.com. Note that this blog does not claim ownership of that image. Nicholas Shah does not claim ownership to the ideas put forth here. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Nicholas Shah and Learning More Than Living with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. Thank You.
A couple points for you to chew on...
ReplyDelete1. TREEHUGGER.com might be a little biased. From the FAO document it referenced: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/mb060e/mb060e00.pdf
"Roughly one-third of the edible parts of food produced for human consumption, gets lost or wasted globally" (which is often <50% except for very large thirds.)
also "Due to lack of sufficient data, many assumptions on food waste levels at foremost the distribution and
consumption levels had to be made. Therefore, the results in this study must be interpreted with great
caution."
2. The Singapore article mentions the vegetables grown from the vertical farm are more expensive then imported ones. This suggests high start-up costs and other reasons might not cause the great drops in costs you are claiming.
Biting off more than you can chew...
ReplyDelete1. The point is an incredibly large amount of food gets wasted from production to plate.
2. Once this is common place, there’s no reason the mass 24/7 year round production and lower transport costs will be able to cover the initial invested capital and be cheaper.
-A Random Guy on the Internet